home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1994
/
oct94.doc
/
000084_owner-lightwave-l _Fri Oct 7 01:34:43 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-03-23
|
1KB
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by mail3.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id XAA29909; Thu, 6 Oct 1994 23:15:11 -0700
Received: from mailhost.ecn.uoknor.edu by mail3.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id XAA29897; Thu, 6 Oct 1994 23:15:08 -0700
Received: by mailhost.ecn.uoknor.edu (Smail3.1.28.1 #20)
id m0qt8Xy-000DKvC; Fri, 7 Oct 94 01:12 CDT
Received: by oubbs.telecom.uoknor.edu
id 01O5E023 Fri, 07 Oct 94 01:11:21
From: alan.chan@oubbs.telecom.uoknor.edu
Message-ID: <9410070111.01O5E02@oubbs.telecom.uoknor.edu>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 94 01:11:21
Subject: THE FLYER
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: bulk
> At the risk of blowing my NDA.... Have any of you thought that there
> may be
> a really good reason for NewTek to not want to have machine control?
> Have
> any of you thought that there may be a really good reason why NewTek
> is
> touting the Flyer as an online solution, refusing to address offline
> work?
Just got back from the Flyer demo in Dallas tonite.. It seems Newtek's stance
(or marketing strategy, whatever the fifty-cent word for it is) is that the
Flyer IS an online solution, and for them to make and include machine code or
EDL generation would confuse the issue and dilute the statement that they as a
company are trying to make..
Taking Q's now.. our Beta units still pending, and I am told we get a beta of
LW4.0 along with it... O boy! Can't wait!
AC